Get more functionality by logging in. If you don't have an account register here. If you are having trouble logging in, please login using this link
Choose a plan or enter a code if you have one then click subscribe
Access All Areas
You are $7.65 away from achieving access all areas. If you spend a total of $7.65 during a billing period you get full access to ALL calculators including as yet unreleased calculators, and no ads, anywhere. Not the expected values? Refresh
Description
If coil rates baffle you or you want to verify your current set-up this is the calculator for you.
 

Instructions

Enter the corner weight (which you can calculate using the Weight Distribution Calculator), the unsprung weight (which is total weight of components not support by the spring) and your existing or intended coil rate using a mixture of US or metric measurements. Press on the orange bar to expand it then enter the suspension leverage value yourself or by pressing Help! which will guide through the process. Notice the blue results bar now displays the wheel frequency. Press on the bar to display the results in more detail. As a guide to what to aim for the following ranges have been extracted from the Competition Car Suspension book by Allan Staniforth: 60 – 80 cpm Comfortable road car, 80 – 100 cpm Sports road car, 100 – 125 cpm Racing cars without wings or ground effects, 200 – 350 cpm Current racing cars with downforce, > 500 cpm Ground effect era cars.
Tags
 

Embedding

Did you know you can embed a working example of your project within your own website? Just copy and paste the HTML code below:

Comments (31)

Adam Grosso April 20, 2010 at 6:03 pm

Does this take into account the angle that the coil spring (or in some cases the pushrod) is mounted? I don’t thik it does but correct me if I’m wrong.

Adam

Huw March 30, 2010 at 2:44 pm

Seems to be okay. Set length AB as 100, BC as 50. Ratio = 2:1. So for each 1cm the wheel moves, the spring is compressed 0.5cm.

Confused. March 26, 2010 at 2:23 am

I am confused here – for a double wishbone type2, is it correct that the frequency will INCREASE as the lever arm BC gets longer relative to AB? Are the motion ratios calculated correctly here? Thanks.

Cris Lowery February 14, 2010 at 5:55 pm

Really nice tool 🙂
Goes quite well with mine